i really don't want to go into why i don't like michael moore in too much detail, because i'd be sitting here all day. but to sum it up, i don't like people who use clever editing and tamper with chronology and facts just prove a point (and more importantly, make money). this guy gets away with it because his audience is made up mostly of college students and smug leftist types who take whatever he says at face value just because it affirms their viewpoints. they assume that just because he names sources, he can be trusted and is somehow noble. it's funny that they don't feel the same about people like bill o'reilly and sean hannity, who are equally reprehensible, but their selective research and presentation of facts doesn't fly with the liberals just because it's the opposing viewpoint. all of these people are scam artists, preaching to the converted and to those too stupid to think for themselves. they are the scum of the earth, all of them.